Skip to content.
   Government Services  Business Reference Desk
Reference Desk Overview
Agendas and Minutes
Calendar
Contact Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Forms
General Information
Links
Newsletter
Click here to search the website!

 

 Home Site Map Help
You are in the Reference Desk section.

 

Planning Commission Minutes

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Nicely, in the Council Chambers at 7:02 p.m.  

PRESENT:                Steve Maas, Virgil Leatherman, Craig Nicely, Bob Poll, and Randy Hartgerink  

ABSENT:                   Dave Zondervan  

ALSO PRESENT:     Ken Krombeen, City Manager

Dan Johnson, Assistant City Manager

Debby Descheneau, Personnel Assistant

Randy Kraker, City Attorney  

Motion by Maas, seconded by Leatherman to approve the agenda as presented.  The motion passed unanimously.  

Motion by Poll, seconded by Maas, to approve the minutes of the December 7, 2005 meeting as presented.  The motion passed unanimously.  

PUBLIC HEARING:  

1.                  Rezoning (multiple properties)  

4267 Canal

4301 Canal

4305 Canal

4307 Canal

4375 Canal

4395 44th Street  

Dan Johnson reviewed that the City Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider rezoning the above properties.  All of the parcels are currently zoned C-5, Commercial Freeway Interchange and have a Master Plan designation of OS-2, Planned Office/Service.  

Dan noted that after the packet had been sent to Commissioners staff received three letters regarding this rezoning request.  They include:  January 4, 2006 letter from Bill Rietscha, Vice President, Facilities, Spectrum Health; January 3, 2006 letter from Pete & Carol Beukema, 4307 Canal and the owners of the Holiday Inn Express Grandville; and January 4, 2006 email from Michael J. Kennedy, President, Park Stone Condominium Association.   

Chairman Nicely opened the public hearing for the rezoning of 4267 Canal; 4301 Canal; 4305 Canal; 4307 Canal; 4375 Canal; and 4395 44th Street at 7:07 p.m.  

Bill Rietscha, Vice President of Spectrum Health Facilities, informed the Planning Commission that this site is not big enough to accommodate their future use and this is the reason for the sale.  The proposed rezoning will limit their selling possibilities and hurt their ability to build a new facility.  Mr. Rietscha also stated that Spectrum Health is willing to explore an alternative plan such as splitting the lots to prevent a big box type development.  

Jeff Pitt & Dan Kukas of DAP Investments, 26105 Lannys Road, Novi, Michigan.  Jeff stated that DAP has smaller retail shops interested in the site.  DAP is willing to consider legal documentation that would assure the site would not be combined with any other lots to build a big box.  

Dan Kukas reiterated that DAP is looking for a community, neighborhood oriented development and that they are only interested in this 5 acre site.  

Ben Yore of Commerce Reality, 32 Market Avenue, Grand Rapids, Michigan, spoke on behalf of DAP Investments stating that a lot of time and money has been spent promoting the site as C-5.   He feels C-5 is the highest and best use for a corner property, particularly for land value.  

Motion by Maas, seconded by Leatherman to accept into record the January 4, 2006 letter from Bill Rietscha, Vice President, Facilities, Spectrum Health; January 3, 2006 letter from Pete & Carol Beukema, 4307 Canal and the owners of the Holiday Inn Express Grandville; and January 4, 2006 email from Michael J. Kennedy, President, Park Stone Condominium Association.  The motion passed unanimously.  

Motion by Poll, supported by Hartgerink to close the public hearing.  The motion passed unanimously.  The public hearing closed at 7:21 p.m.   

Bob Poll asked if the Planning Commission could recommend something other than OS-2.  Randy Kraker stated the Planning Commission could only recommend something less intensive than what is be proposed.  

Virgil Leatherman suggested the option of a PUD, with more intensive on the corner, less intensive as you go north.  Feels it’s a good option for traffic flow and gives the City more control.  

Randy Hartgerink agrees with Virgil Leatherman and would like to see higher intensity on the corner and lower intensity to the north.  Randy feels just office is not the best use for the site.   

Chairman Nicely asked if individual action can be taken on each lot or can it only be one recommendation.  Randy Kraker stated individual action could be taken.  

Bob Poll asked if the site fits the 5 acre PUD requirements.  Dan Johnson replied yes.  

Steve Maas asked if the 5 acres could be reduced.  Randy Kraker replied yes.  

Virgil Leatherman asked if there could be multiple applicants to one PUD.    Randy Kraker replied if there was an agreement among property owners to submit a unified request that they could combine properties to meet any necessary requirements.   

Chairman Nicely feels some commercial is appropriate and less intensive as you move north makes sense.  Would like to include this area to the Master Plan discussion.   

Virgil Leatherman likes the idea of discussing this with the Master Plan and questioned what the urgency from Council is.  

Ken Krombeen noted the request came about from the November 30, 2005 joint meeting and also from the Hope Network decision where a parcel that was Master Planned one way and a rezoning request came in consistent with the Master Plan recommended by the Planning Commission for approval and subsequently denied by the Council.  This collection of properties is in the same category, it is currently zoned inconsistently with the Master Plan and was therefore an extension of the joint meeting and Hope Network conversations.   

Motion by Poll, supported by Maas to recommend the rezoning of 4267 Canal; 4301 Canal; 4305 Canal; 4307 Canal; 4375 Canal; and 4395 44th Street from C-5 Commercial Freeway Interchange to OS-2 Planned Office/Service District with the possibility of a PUD, onto the City Council for adoption.   The motion passed 4-1 with Randy Hartgerink opposing.  

OLD BUSINESS:  

1.         Zoning Ordinance Discussion  

Dan Johnson reviewed the notes from last months input regarding the recreational equipment ordinance.   

Bob Poll asked how a licensed car parked on the street is different than a licensed recreational vehicle.  Bob feels as long as the recreational vehicle is parked in the driveway, does not block the sidewalk, and is licensed it should be able to be parked there.  Possibly do seasonal time limits.   Bob also feels that effective screening needs to be very clear.  He does not feel that boats docked on a lake should count as the one allowed recreational vehicle per residence.   

Virgil Leatherman stated if there were no regulations then there would be no enforcement issues.  However, if there is going to be regulations then the enforcement should match the regulations.  Virgil stated he would not like to see a boat on a trailer in a driveway all summer.  

Bob Poll noted that almost all ordinances are enforced on neighbor complaints.   

Virgil Leatherman stated that RV’s are sometimes year round, not just a single incident.  

Randy Hartgerink noted that the length needs to be addressed, possibly 30 – 32 feet maximum to accommodate newer RVs.  He likes the back yard storage along with 3 days before and after a trip for parking.  He is not in favor of parking recreational vehicles all season long.  

Bob Poll suggested that a minimum length should be considered as well.  For example if the property has a garage a 20’ boat could be stored in the garage.  

Virgil Leatherman suggested someone other than the Police be allowed to write tickets.   

Chairman Nicely reviewed what had been discussed:  

            1) Length of stay should be 3 days before and after a trip.

            2) Effectively screened.  Possibly take this language out all together.

            3) Setbacks and location.

            4) Define what behind the front of the house means.

            5) Enforcement will be looked at after a draft ordinance has been created.  

Staff was directed to create a rough draft ordinance for the Planning Commission to review. 

2.         Planning Commission Vacancy Discussion  

Dan Johnson informed the Planning Commission that of the eight questionnaires sent to applicants Jack Bengtson, Barb Brown, and Gene LaSarge provided responses.   

Bob Poll feels that all three provided good responses; however Jack Bengtson stands out in his mind, noting that Jack has been attending meetings regularly and is familiar with the current proceedings of the Planning Commission.  

Steve Maas feels they are all qualified and feels any of the three would be a good fit.   

Randy Hartgerink agrees with Bob Poll on Jack Bengtson, but feels all three are qualified.   

Virgil Leatherman likes all three applicants and would not mind passing all of them onto the City Council for consideration.  

Chairman Nicely likes Jack Bengtson, but feels all three are qualified.   

Motion by Poll, supported by Hartgerink to recommend the Grandville Planning Commission board appointment of Jack Bengtson onto the City Council for approval.   The motion passed 4-0 with Virgil Leatherman abstaining.   

3.         Master Plan Discussion  

Dan Johnson informed the Planning Commission that a Request for Proposals (RFP) has been drafted.  Before finalizing the RFP’s the Planning Commission needs to determine whether or not the Master Plan (MP) needs to be examined.  If it is agreed that the MP should be looked at then it is a question of what areas.  Also the City Council will need to provide some input as the new Master Plan regulations require Council consideration.   Funds for the project would need to be submitted for the 2006-2007 fiscal year.   

The Planning Commission would like to revisit the Master Plan.  Areas discussed were the Downtown Development Authority district; south of 40th or 42nd; and east & west of the city limits.  Staff was directed to review the RFP’s and bring them back next month.  

Randy Kraker noted that the City Council has statutory rights to sign off on the Master Plan.  

PUBLIC COMMENT

Chairman Niecly asked if there was any public comment to be made.  

Jeff Smolinski of X-Rite, 3100 44th Street SW, Grandville, Michigan, came before the Planning Commission to answer any questions they may have regarding the marketability assessment.  There were no questions from the Planning Commission.  

Barb Smith, 4262 40th Street came before the Planning Commission to state the width of RV’s should be addressed in the ordinance.  She suggested a maximum width of 8.5 feet.  She also asked if the Police Department could verify the length of RV’s using information registered under the license plate.   

OTHER BUSINESS

Chairman Nicely asked if there was any other business to discuss.  There was none.  

Motion by Poll, supported by Leatherman to adjourn.  The motion passed unanimously.  T he meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m.  

Debby Descheneau

Recording Secretary

 

  Help  -  Home
  Search  -  Site Map
Community  -  Government
Services  -  Business
Reference Desk

Municipal Web Services' Accessibility Logo.  Click here to go to the Municipal Web Services' website to read more about Accessibility.

Contact the webmaster by clicking here.
Comments regarding website technical problems can be sent here.

An online community since 2000.

City of Grandville
3195 Wilson Avenue SW
Grandville, MI 49418
(616) 531-3030

This page last modified 07/01/11 .
All information © 2004 Grandville, Michigan 

Site Use Policy

Site Design/
Development by
Municipal Web Services