Planning Commission Minutes
CITY OF GRANDVILLE
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
June 4, 2003
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Poll, in the Council
Chambers at 7:02 p.m.
PRESENT: Jodie Sherman, William Timmer, Craig Nicely, Bob Poll,
Dave Zondervan and Steve Maas.
ABSENT: Virgil Leatherman
ALSO PRESENT: Dan Johnson, Assistant City Manager
Ken Krombeen, City Manager
Debby Descheneau, Personnel Assistant
Motion by Nicely, seconded by Maas, to amend the agenda as
follows: new item number one under new business – Cora Plat,
buffering and lighting. The motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Sherman, seconded by Nicely to approve the amended
agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Zondervan, seconded by Maas, to approve the minutes of
the May 7, 2003 meeting as presented. The motion passed unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING
- Special Land Use – Hoop City Basketball Indoor
Recreation/Health Fitness Center
Public Hearing cancelled due to applicant’s withdrawal.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Cora Plat – Buffer Yards and Lighting
Dan explained that the buffer yards and lighting were relative to
two of the items being presented this evening; West Michigan
Rehabilitation and Dr. James Kessel. Dan reviewed the zoning
ordinance language for landscaping and buffer yards and explained
that buffer yards come into play when Residential and
Non-residential property meets. Dan reviewed options available to
the commissioners and recommended that the buffer yard be consistent
throughout the Cora Plat. Dan also recommended that the
commissioners take into consideration lighting and that the higher
the light the more visible it will be to neighboring properties.
Discussion was held amongst the commissioners on what would be a
reasonable space for the buffer yard. Timmer thought that a ten foot
buffer yard would be sufficient while other commissioners were
considering fifteen to twenty feet to allow for more variety. All of
the commissioners agreed that the lighting and landscaping should be
consistent throughout the site. Fencing across the back of the
property was also an option for the buffer yard.
Poll is concerned with lights shining into the residential
district and suggested that less than twenty feet for the buffer
yard would be acceptable if the building was placed in such a
position that parking was not facing the residential properties.
Poll confirmed that all commissioners were in agreement with
natural buffering and consistent lighting throughout the whole
property. Poll asked Dan Johnson if there should be a motion for
their discussion or if it was for their general knowledge. Dan
informed the commissioners that it was for their general knowledge
as they move forward with the individual lots.
2. Site Plan Review – Gary Armbrecht, Dental Office
Dan Johnson reviewed site plan comments for the proposed 10,224
square foot dental building located on lot seven of the Cora Plat.
Dan informed the Commissioners that they may reduce the parking
setbacks along Macatawa Drive to five feet if there is sufficient
landscaping to offset the reduced front yard parking setback. This
property essentially has two front yards as the building fronts on
Macatawa Drive and 44th Street. Dan informed the Commissioners that
they had a letter from BHS Properties, L.L.C., owners of the
undeveloped parcel directly East of Lot 7, that states they are in
agreement with a shared driveway and shows a new curb cut that
allows this. Should the shared driveway be required then a
cross-access agreement should be provided to the City.
Mike Baker from Exxel Engineering – 5252 Clyde Park, Grand Rapids
MI 49509, came before the Planning Commission to state the applicant
is in agreement with all of Dan’s site plan comments and that he was
happy to answer any further questions from the Commissioners.
Timmer asked why the right of way was moved over towards the
south. Dan informed him that driveway widens as you go west on 44th
Street as the intersection widens and the southeast corner has been
deeded over to the City for right of way purposes for a highway use.
Maas complimented the applicant on the looks of the building. He
also asked about the timeline for construction. The applicant is
hopeful that it will start yet this year.
Nicely asked if there was a suggestion for how much the sidewalk
could increase? Dan informed the Commissioners that he was leaving
that up to their discretion.
Nicely stated he would like to see consistent pole heights and
lighting levels.
Motion by Nicely, supported by Maas to approve the site plan with
the following conditions 1) final utility connections subject to
Department of Public Works and City Engineer approval 2) sidewalk
between front of building and parking spaces should be widened to
six feet to accommodate vehicle overhang 3) sidewalk along 44th
Street shall be relocated so it is within the property 4) sidewalk
along Macatawa Drive is required as was shown on the approved Plat
5) separate sign permit required for signage 6) curbcut to Macatawa
Drive shall be moved to the east per the revised sketch from Exxel
Engineering dated June 3, 2003 and that a shared access agreement
shall be provided to the City of Grandville for these two lots 7)
light poles to be consistent at a height of 20 feet and light levels
to also be consistent. The motion passed unanimously.
3. Site Plan Review – West Michigan Rehabilitation
Dan Johnson reviewed site plan comments for the proposed 12,000
square foot medical building located on the first lot on the north
side of Macatawa Drive, lot 6. Dan reviewed a memo received by Exxel
Engineering that came over earlier in the day and they address some
of the site plan comments. The first one pertained to utilities, the
applicant now has the 2" water service connected to the 8" watermain.
Site grading has also been addressed on the revised site plans. In
addition Bob Bruggink, Moore & Bruggink, Inc. will do a final review
of the revised plans for final approval. A revised landscaping plan
has also been submitted and provides the legend that explains the
number and sizes of landscaping along with the types of trees and
shrubs to be used on the site. Dan informed the Commissioners that
they will want to discuss a possible shared driveway. Dan introduced
a memo from Pete LaMourie that suggests a shared driveway between
lots 5 and 6. It was also suggested that aside from the driveway the
Commissioners will also want to discuss buffer yards and lighting.
Poll asked if an access agreement was placed upon the developer
would new owners of the property have to accept that agreement? Dan
confirmed, yes.
Mike Baker from Exxel Engineering – 5252 Clyde Park, Grand Rapids
MI 49509, came before the Planning Commission to state the applicant
is in agreement with all of Dan’s site plan comments, except for the
shared access. Baker informed the Commissioners that they did try to
design the driveway so it would benefit both lots 5 and 6. Excel has
the driveway back from the property line to allow for flexibility
since it is unsure how lot 5 will develop once it is sold. Baker
stated he was happy to answer any questions from Commissioners.
Poll and Nicely stated they both like the driveway plans from
Exxel Engineering rather than the suggested driveway plan from Pete
LaMourie.
Nicely noted that the grading plan did have a bit of grade
differential from lot 5. Baker informed the Commissioners that the
applicant is bringing in fill to their site for building height.
Nicely asked if the building was going to be divided up into
suites? Baker informed him that it would be divided up with the back
corner being a weight room and employee entrance.
The Commissioners agree that at least six foot trees with no
fencing should be adequate for protection of the residential
district, however they are unsure of the types of trees to be
planted on the site. The Commissioners are suggesting a faster
growing tree. Ken Krombeen noted that the applicant is already
prepared to purchase both Douglas Firs for the back of the property
and Blue Spruces for the front of the property, and suggest a
mixture of both along the back of the site.
Dan Johnson brought up the wood chip walkway that runs through
the property and suggested the Commissioners discuss its purpose.
The Commissioners were in agreement that they did not see a problem
with the wood chip walkway since the property owner would maintain
it.
Dan Johnson made note that City staff was in agreement with Pete
LaMourie’s driveway plan.
Motion by Zondervan, supported by Nicely to approve the site plan
with the following conditions 1) final utility connections subject
to Department of Public Works and City Engineer approval, 2)
separate sign permit required for signage, 3) an easement agreement
shall be provided to the City of Grandville for lots 5 and 6, 4)
driveway constructed under the June 2, 2003 revised plans submitted
by Excel Engineering, 5) 8’ – 10’ Blue Spruce and Douglas Fir tree
mix on the north (back) side of the property 6) light poles to be
consistent at a height of 20 feet or less. The motion passed
unanimously.
It was recommended that the Planning Commission hold off on item
#4 – Dr. James Kessel – until Dr. Kessel arrived for the meeting.
The Commissioners unanimously agreed and move to item #5 – Grand
Point PUD Expansion.
4. Site Plan Review – Grande Pointe PUD – Expansion
Dan Johnson reviewed the PUD comments for the addition of a
residential parcel to the south of the PUD. The applicant is
proposing three curbcuts for the addition, Dan informed the
Commissioners that City staff feels this is one curbcut too many and
that a traffic review would be done at the next stage of planning.
It was also noted that the addition would have to be rezoned from
RR, Rural Residential to OS-2, Planned Office/Service District in
order to be considered or final approval.
Jeff Smith from SE Spohn Construction, 5084 Exchange Dr, Flint MI
48507, came before the Planning Commission to state that the band
and sidewalk conditions from last months meeting have been meet.
Jeff also noted that they have moved the building back slightly to
accommodate for a driveway that the Planning Commission recommended.
Nicely asked if the decorative sidewalk did have curbs to permit
cars from using it as an access. Jeff informed the Commissioners
that there was indeed curbs along the walkway.
The Planning Commission conducted a preliminary plan review on
the amended PUD and concurred the applicant may proceed with final
plan review.
5. Site Plan Approval Extension – Elders Electric
Dan Johnson reviewed the history of Elders Electric and that they
were given site plan approval last year. Their year is just about to
expire and they are requesting an extension. Dan informed the
Commissioners that the applicant is aware that the extension is good
for sixty days. Should the extension expire and the applicant is
aware that they will have to start the site plan review process
over.
Motion by Zondervan, supported by Maas to approve the sixty-day
site plan approval extension. The motion passed unanimously.
With Dr. Kessel still not present for his site plan review,
Chairman Poll addressed the Commissioners with a letter he received
from the Ottawa County Planning Commission who is trying to put a
plan together for the entire county to see how it compares to
Grandville. They are encouraging Grandville’s Commissioners to give
input into the plan and get on their mailing list for updates.
PUBLIC COMMENT
1. Chairman Poll asked if there were any public comments to be
made. There were none.
OTHER BUSINESS
1. Recommendation of Appointments – Two Commission Positions
Dan informed the Planning Commissioners that Jody Sherman’s, who
is finishing out Joe Valicevic’s term, and David Zondervan’s terms
were expiring. Both have agreed to serve another term.
Motion by Maas, supported by Timmer to recommend re-appointments
of Jodie Sherman and David Zondervan onto the City Council. The
motion passed unanimously.
2. July Meeting
Dan Johnson informed the Commissioners that the July meeting
would take place on July 2nd and wanted to make sure there would be
a quorum. All Planning Commissioners present plan on attending the
July 2, 2003 meeting.
NEW BUSINESS CONTINUTED:
6. Site Plan Review – James Kessel, Dental Office
Dan Johnson reviewed the site plan comments for a 4,320 square
foot dental office on lot 4 of the Cora Plat. Dan informed the
Commissioners that the plans in front of them are revised plans that
have been reviewed by the Bob Bruggink, City Engineer. Bob is
however still reviewing the grading issue and the standard condition
of final utility connections subject to Department of Public Works
and City Engineer approval will assure the grading is in order
before construction starts. Dan reminded the Commissioners that they
are setting the buffer yard at 20 feet for the Cora Plat and he is
unsure how that would work with this lot. He suggests reducing the
front yard set back from 20 feet to 10 feet, basically shifting
everything to the South. Lighting and landscaping should also be
considered in order to keep the Cora Plat consistent. Dan mentioned
that he did talk to the architect working on lot 3 to the west and
they are comfortable with a shared access. Dan recommends a shared
access agreement be provided to the City of Grandville for lots 3
and 4.
Mike Woodsack with TJA Architecture – 4040 Tallman Creek NW,
Grand Rapids MI 49544 – came before the Commissioners to answer any
questions.
Nicely noted that he liked the concept of the garage and that it
is a great way to handle issues of storage of snowplows, to molds,
to salt, etc.
Maas commented that he likes the design of the building.
Poll asked if the ten-foot buffer yard that is proposed has berms
or is it flat with landscaping. Mike noted that it was flat with
landscaping.
Mike also noted that this lot will sit lower than the neighbors
to the north will and that the parking on the north is for employees
who will typically work 8:00 am – 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday.
Motion by Nicely, supported by Maas to approve the site plan with
the following conditions 1) final utility connections subject to
Department of Public Works and City Engineer approval, 2) separate
sign permit required for signage, 3) a shared access agreement shall
be provided to the City of Grandville for lots 3 and 4, 4) 20 foot
buffer yard on the north side with gentle undulating berms and no
fence 5) reduce front yard setbacks from 20’ to 10’ 6) maximum light
pole height is 20 feet. The motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Nicely, supported by Sherman to adjourn. The motion
passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Debby Descheneau
Recording Secretary
Contact the webmaster by clicking here.
Comments regarding website technical problems can be sent here.
An online community since 2000.
City of Grandville
3195 Wilson Avenue SW
Grandville, MI 49418
(616) 531-3030
This page last modified
07/01/11 .
All information © 2004 Grandville, Michigan
Site Use Policy
Site Design/
Development by
 |
|